Search for: All records

In strong story experience management problems, an automated storytelling agent balances player autonomy with narrative structure in the context of an interactive story game world. However, it is possible for the game world to get softlocked in states outside narrative structures specified by the game designer. These states are called dead-ends. In this paper, we revisit adversarial strong story experience management, a framing of the experience management problem that models interactive storytelling as an adversarial game where dead-ends are losses. This framing is adversarial against narrative softlocks, not necessarily the player. We present a novel agent based on adversarial search and deep reinforcement learning, which is trained to avoid dead-ends while preserving player autonomy. We compare our approach to a reactive, narrative plan-based mediation system on a test set of games compatible with current narrative planning techniques. We show that our adversarial architecture outperforms narrative mediation on a suite of dead-end metrics during game trace and breadth-first tests of state transition system exploration, using classical and intentional planning domains. 

This paper presents a software library that enumerates the space of a state transition system specified by an action language, visualizes the states and action connections as a graph, and modifies the visualization based on underlying features determined through state and graph analysis. The library is intended as a tool for strong story interactive narrative design. 

An interactive narrative is bound by the context of the world where its story takes place. However, most work in interactive narrative generation takes its story world design and mechanics as given, which abdicates a large part of story generation to an external world designer. In this paper, we close the story world design gap with an evolutionary search framework for generating interactive narrative worlds and mechanics. Our framework finds story world designs that accommodate multiple distinct player roles. We evaluate our system with an action agreement ratio analysis that shows worlds generated by our framework provide a greater number of in-role action opportunities compared to story worlds randomly sampled from the generative space.